Friday, August 26, 2016
2016.Book40 - A Borrowed Man (Wolfe)
Very good. Pretty cool that it's almost all dialog. You get a strange world with lots unexplained (or maybe I just missed it).
Thursday, August 18, 2016
Monday, August 15, 2016
Thursday, August 11, 2016
2016.Book35 - Unapologetic (Spufford)
Mixed. Snarky English argumentativness is just annoying. Descriptions of personal experience are great. But there's a big gap between meditative experiences and social/political effects. He marvels that the massive edifice of Christendom has been built on such a tiny, fragile set of experiences, but I think he'll find that is hasn't.
Tuesday, August 02, 2016
2016.Book34 - The Affinities (Wilson)
Just OK. Should be a good story: a protagonist with a conflict between his unaccepting family and the community he finds in another city. But Wilson kind of glosses over how Adam fits in with the Taus.
Julian Comstock was such a good book, but nothing else Wilson has done has really grabbed me. Kind of like Hansen's Chess Garden. Maybe it's me?
Julian Comstock was such a good book, but nothing else Wilson has done has really grabbed me. Kind of like Hansen's Chess Garden. Maybe it's me?
Friday, July 29, 2016
Wednesday, July 27, 2016
Monday, July 25, 2016
2016.Book31 - Too Like The Lightning (Palmer)
Some cool ideas and extrapolations (though a little too neatly relevant). More revelations than plot. The scale of characters and rebellion is wrong. Will be interesting to read the rest of the series.
Thursday, July 07, 2016
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
2016.Book29 - Quantum Night (Sawyer)
Unjustifiably optimistic, irritatingly arrogant. Like a kids' version of Neuropath.
2016.Book28 - Under Major Domo Minor (DeWitt)
Pretty good. Starts off boring, then good, then weird, then good again.
Monday, June 13, 2016
Monday, May 30, 2016
2016.Book25 - Incompleteness (Goldstein)
The exposition of the proof was fine, as was the biographical background.
Unfortunately, Goldstein makes the Vienna Circle positivists the goofy villains of the story, hypnotized by and yet misunderstanding Wittgenstein, with Godel sitting quietly until he can destroy their errors. To do this, she has to misrepresent the Circle's views; changing them from "nothing we can't experience is relevant" to "nothing we can't understand is real".
Unfortunately, Goldstein makes the Vienna Circle positivists the goofy villains of the story, hypnotized by and yet misunderstanding Wittgenstein, with Godel sitting quietly until he can destroy their errors. To do this, she has to misrepresent the Circle's views; changing them from "nothing we can't experience is relevant" to "nothing we can't understand is real".
Friday, May 20, 2016
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)